The Russian Peresviet Class (built 1898 - 1902)

Peresviet and her two sister ships Pobieda (the name means "Victory") and Osliabya were rather unexceptional second-class battleships of 12,000 tons, carrying a main armament of four 10" guns apiece, capable of 18 kts. on trials but, more realistically, 16+ sustained kts. at sea. For an enlargement of the bow shot at left, click here. Built in the Tsarist regime's Admiralty Yard at Kronstadt, they were workmanlike but lacking in technical finesse, like most Russian-made vessels; like many, they were the product of a cloudy concept as well. They were an adaptation of the French tumble-home hull idea, built as a section of the ship between four armored pillars holding down the ends (see photo below right). It was therefore odd that they should have been the cause of such a severe case of jitters at the British Admiralty.

In one of the worst intelligence mix-ups before the WMD fiasco in Iraq, the Pobiedas were reported to British intelligence as 19-kt superbattleships capable of challenging -- even besting -- the British Majestics and Bulwarks. As had been quite common for some decades, it was demanded that Britain meet the challenge by building an entire class of ships as a "reply" to the Russians, the ships being designed to counter the new Russian vessels' supposed capabilities point by point, as the Powerful class cruisers had been built as a "reply" to the Ruriks. The "reply" ships became known as the Duncan class, the last class of battleships to be wholly designed by long-time DNC Sir William White. To say that this 6-ship class of fast, 19-knot pre-dreadnought battleships, (each mounting four 12-inch guns and a dozen 6-inchers) represented British over-reaction would be an understatement. In fact the Peresviets were second-class battleships inspired by the British colonial battleships Barfleur and Centurion of 1893. The Russian ships were never intended to be main battle line units. Rather, they were more of a super armored cruiser (compare to hull shape of Aurora) intended for commerce raiding in the Far East, with 6" bow chaser gun and relatively high speed, but a limited armor belt and scant protection for the barbettes. When they were drafted to the battle line their performance was not impressive. Apparently British intelligence operatives in Petersburg conflated the speed specifications for Pallada class cruisers with the armament of a heavy battleship, exaggerated like mad, and shook twice before reporting it to Whitehall -- much as Ahmed Chalabi's exile organization made a fortune telling paranoid ears in the U.S. government what they wanted to hear about Iraq in 2000-03.

This quarter view of Peresviet (completed 1901) shows the main characteristics of the class: high forecastle and sides, three stubby funnels, two masts with fighting tops and separate topmasts as in the French fleet cruisers (French battleships had space-age masts with electric elevators inside them and flying-saucer-like gunhouses at the masthead), a short forecastle just big enough for a 10" turret, 2 capstans, and a few bitts and cleats. The sided 6" and 75mm guns were carried in casemates stacked on two decks, guaranteeing that at least half the guns would be unworkable in any kind of weather. The Peresviets had a compact, chunky look with their tall, haughty sides, and a longish, low quarterdeck. Russian warships frequently mimicked the French mania for plow-like ram bows, pronounced tumble-home and high sides, as seen from this angle, though the Persviets were not an extreme example. This design had marked disadvantages, among them top-heaviness, diminished stability, and cramped deck space on the upper levels. In addition, the Peresviets were underprotected and under-gunned; and ill-prepared for the ruthless warfare that awaited them in the Far East. Far from intimidating natives and protecting trade, they ended up fighting the cream of the Japanese fleet -- the latest designs from London.

Specifications for the class:
Dimensions: 424' x 71'6" x 27'4" Displacement: 12,683 tons standard. Armament: (4) 10"/45 cal., (11) 6"/45 guns, (20) 75mm guns, (5) 15" torpedo tubes. Armor: mostly Krupp Cemented (KC) armor, with some Harvey armor. Belt: 9", barbettes 8", turrets 10", deck 2.75", conning tower 10", casemates 5". Propulsion: 32 coal-fired Belleville boilers; (3) inverted vertical triple expansion engines developing 15,000 HP, shafted to triple screw. Speed: 18 knots. Endurance: 3,500 nm @ 10 kts. Fuel capacity: 2,100 tons of coal. Crew: 752 officers and men.
Ships in class: Peresviet · Pobieda · Oslyabya

Metric specifications:
Dimensions: 133m x 21.8m x 8m. Displacement: 12,683 tons standard. Armament: (4) 254 mm/45 cal., (11) 152 mm/45, and (20) 75mm guns; (5) 381 mm torpedo tubes. Armor: mostly Krupp KC armor, with some Harvey armor. Belt 229 mm, barbettes 203 mm, turrets 254 mm, deck 70 mm, conning tower 254 mm, casemates 127 mm. Propulsion: 32 coal-fired Belleville boilers; (3) inverted vertical triple expansion engines developing 11,186 kW, shafted to triple screw. Speed: 33.3 km/hr. Endurance: 6,482 km @ 18.5 km/hr. Fuel capacity: 2,100 tons of coal. Crew: 752.

For a detailed plan of the class, click here.

Card stock model of Osliabya.

As judged by their performance in battle, the Peresviet class needn't have spooked the British. In the Russo-Japanese War all 3 of the ships were sunk and put out of action by the Japanese. Peresviet was stationed at Port Arthur with the main fleet, along with Pobieda. They were involved in a sortie in strength in August 1904, resulting in Russian breakout and pitched battle with the Japanese battle fleet offshore as afternoon deepened into evening. Peresviet became the flagship at the Battle of the Yellow Sea after the commanding admiral was killed and his flagship Tsesarevich disabled; but Peresviet herself sustained 39 hits and had her signal halyards shot away so she was a most ineffective flagship, though she survived to sink another day, and later to serve the enemy. Sister ship Pobieda also survived the battle only to be bottled up in Port Arthur until the city fell to the Japanese in January 1905. There they were sunk by plunging fire from the heights starting in Nov. 1904. All the warships sank or scuttled by the surrender, just into the New Year. Meanwhile the third sister Osliabya had been detained in European waters by mechanical problems, until ordered off to the Far East with the flower of the Baltic fleet in Oct. 1904. After an 18,000-nm voyage the Russian "Second Pacific Fleet" (as the Tsar dubbed the ill-assorted agglomeration) met obliteration while trying to run the strait between Japan and Korea. Leading the port column into a tornado of Japanese HE and AP projectiles at the Battle of Tsushima, Osliabya became the first of seven Russian battleships to be sunk that day. Her 2 sisters were soon raised by the Japanese during the summer of 1905, extensively rebuilt, and added to the Mikado's naval lineup in 1907-08, though they were obsolete by that time and used primarily for coastal defense. The rebuild added lengthened funnels which made the ships' profiles more comely, and improved their speed. In all 6 Russian oceangoing battleships and 2 large coast-defense ironclads with 10" guns were added to the Mikado's fleet in this way or by capture. After enjoying their quirks for a decade more or less, the Japanese were glad to sell them back to the Russians when chance placed them on the same side in WWI.

Russian Pre-Dreadnought Battleship Models from Com-Brig